but there also is
good reason to be careful.
I don't think it is quite good enough that Creative Commons understands
what they mean, if the users of the license don't understand as well.
==
Doug Jensen
[1] I like text browsers for several reasons, and have read comments by
others exp
x27;t think they all know that the
piece of text isn't part of the license. I also think that others could
use the layout of the page as a model for derivative licenses and I
don't think that would be good. I do like the basic concept of the CC
licenses though, meaning the freedom of choice.
It would be helpful if the page was explicit, not leaving anything implied.
Keeping the users in mind is important isn't it?
--
Doug Jensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 04:14:23PM +0200, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
> be modifiable. Or a piece may contain the author's opinion on something, and
> nobody should be allowed to represent the author's position by modifying
> that piece.
Should "represent" be changed to &
t is, after Sarge is released.
--
Doug Jensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
You can go directly to the lists of free, non-free and
non-redistributable licenses.
- IMHO it would be better if that sentence didn't start a new line.
In other words, just normal spacing as in a paragraph.
--
Doug Jensen
5 matches
Mail list logo
