Anthony DeRobertis said:
> (Sec. 201(a)):
> Copyright in a work protected under this title vests initially
> in the author or authors of the work. The authors of a joint
> work are coowners of copyright in the work.
>
> So, I wonder, how many open-source works qualify as joint wo
Richard Braakman said:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:57:20AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> In order to do this, I must maintain the invariant sections.
>> These invariant sections (written in English) are unreadable to the
>> Elbonians.
>> I could also translate the invariant section to Elbonia
David B Harris said:
> On Sat, 24 May 2003 19:19:50 -0400
> Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A political essay is (typically) written by certain persons to
>> persuade the public of a certain position. If it is modified, it does
>> not do its job. So it makes sense, socially, to say
Don Armstrong said:
> On Thu, 22 May 2003, Nick Phillips wrote:
>> I would assert, though, that it is possible to phrase one's
>> construction such that it is not reasonable to argue about it.
>
> Sure. I think most of us would agree that an unequivocally proper
> phrasing of such a construction is
Henning Makholm said:
> Scripsit Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> RMS could use his 'moral rights' to prevent someone from
>> distributing a version of Emacs which could read and write Microsoft
>> Word files (file format being reverse-engineered).
>
> No he can't. His placing Emacs under a
5 matches
Mail list logo
