On Oct 31, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMHO, DFSG#2 refers to source code, as is usually defined, that is to > say, as in the GNU GPL v2. No, it does not. As usual, you are just inventing new requirements which are not specified by the DFSG.
> Deliberately obfuscated code is absolutely against the spirit of Free > Software. But if it is X11-licensed then it is still free software, which is what matters here. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
