Re: [Pkg-pascal-devel] Please confirm non-distributability of Novell SDK material

2014-04-21 Thread roucaries bastien
Could you open a lintian bug with: - md5sum - sha1 - sha256 of the previous file. I will add to not distributable list of file On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org wrote: On 20-04-14 17:57, Abou Al Montacir wrote: Please find below a discussion about a licence issue

Re: Re: About the licensing of URW Garamond No. 8

2013-08-27 Thread roucaries bastien
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: Am Freitag, den 23.08.2013, 16:32 -0300 schrieb Rogério Brito: Anyway, back to URW Garamond No. 8, I guess that the letter that I wrote may still be relevant. Should I try sending it? Yes, please do so! Maybe we

Re: docsis linking to libsnmp which links against libopenssl

2013-06-03 Thread roucaries bastien
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez perezme...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone! I have a question about the license status of a package I maintain, docsis. Docsis uses libsnmp. In turn, since the last upload, libsnmp added -lcrypto, making it link against libopenssl.

Re: Advice regarding deleted images on Commons (tarot deck)

2013-06-03 Thread roucaries bastien
Any news ? On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Thomas Preud'homme robo...@debian.org wrote: Le samedi 13 avril 2013 16:50:38, roucaries bastien a écrit : Ok get it it seems http://visualiseur.bnf.fr/Visualiseur?Destination=DaguerreO=8013775E=JPEG NavigationSimplifiee=oktypeFonds=noir Ask

Re: Advice regarding deleted images on Commons (tarot deck)

2013-04-13 Thread roucaries bastien
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Goffi go...@goffi.org wrote: Le 06/04/2013 23:45, John Vandenberg a écrit : [SNIP] Do the copyright check yourself. Do you know of an online resource that shows a Piatnik deck with a rough publishing date, so they can be used for comparison? You might

Re: Advice regarding deleted images on Commons (tarot deck)

2013-04-13 Thread roucaries bastien
Ok go here for research http://www.bnf.fr/fr/collections_et_services/anx_dep/a.estampes_photographie_classement.html On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:41 PM, roucaries bastien roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Goffi go...@goffi.org wrote: Le 06/04/2013 23:45

Re: Advice regarding deleted images on Commons (tarot deck)

2013-04-13 Thread roucaries bastien
Or here http://images.bnf.fr/jsp/index.jsp On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:43 PM, roucaries bastien roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com wrote: Ok go here for research http://www.bnf.fr/fr/collections_et_services/anx_dep/a.estampes_photographie_classement.html On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:41 PM

Re: Advice regarding deleted images on Commons (tarot deck)

2013-04-13 Thread roucaries bastien
Ok get it it seems http://visualiseur.bnf.fr/Visualiseur?Destination=DaguerreO=8013775E=JPEGNavigationSimplifiee=oktypeFonds=noir Ask to the BNF desk the acquision history. Bastien On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:47 PM, roucaries bastien roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com wrote: Or here http

Re: Non-free postscript code in EPS image

2012-08-07 Thread roucaries bastien
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Michael Wild them...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Dear all I'm maintaining a package that contains an EPS image created with Adobe Illustrator and hence contains postscript library code that is copyrighted by Adobe, e.g.: * Copyright(C)2000-2006 Adobe

Status of a debian pacakge with BSD4 triple lisencied under GPL/LGPL/MPL

2011-07-04 Thread roucaries bastien
Hi, I whish to inquire about license of a package triple licensied under GPL/LGPL/MPL I have found that libnss3 have some file under BSD4 and could not be to my own opinion be compatible with GPL* Do you agree with this analysis ? Bastien *see

Re: GPL applications using Python (OpenSSL issue?)

2011-03-07 Thread roucaries bastien
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Ulrik Sverdrup ulrik.sverd...@gmail.com wrote: Can GPLv3+ applications written in Python exist in Debian main? The applications in question do not use an openssl exception. Python uses OpenSSL so the moment the application starts, it is linking against it too:

Font licencing

2005-08-12 Thread roucaries bastien
I create a subroutine used in type1 font. Do you think that with licence is suitable. In want: o free copy even in commercial font o free modification even in commercial closed font o I don't want final users of thefont, the document writers, put a credit line in thier document :-). Even in pdf

Re: Font licencing

2005-08-12 Thread roucaries bastien
On 8/13/05, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:42:31AM +, roucaries bastien wrote: If you want to use the previous exeption put also in human readable form the following credit in your file before the licence: ''This software use a /OtherSubrs function

Re: Font and hinting problem

2005-08-11 Thread roucaries bastien
First please CC me as I'm not a member of the list. Andrew Suffield wrote: If there is no other sensible way to write the function then it's not copyrightable. But be pretty damned sure of that before taking advantage of it. Fortunatly, I can rewrite the program and it look like a little bit

Font and hinting problem

2005-08-10 Thread roucaries bastien
i want to package metatype1 for debian this program use postscript program that is really short and copyrighted by adobe. The problem it's that if I rewrite this 3 lines they will always look like the original See for more information