Re: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

2023-01-16 Thread tony mancill
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:33:07AM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html > > Rober

Re: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

2023-01-16 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html > Roberto, Tobias, thanks for your answers. > > I have removed MagicSFver2.sf2 from the package and

Re: LGPL code that includes files licensed under Sun Public License 1.0 - DFSG-free?

2009-08-17 Thread tony mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hendrik Weimer wrote: Tony Mancill tmanc...@debian.org writes: We've requested that the upstream author release a new upstream version with the updated license, and are waiting for his reply. But I wanted to ask the list if that is strictly

Re: LGPL code that includes files licensed under Sun Public License 1.0 - DFSG-free?

2009-08-15 Thread Tony Mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hendrik Weimer wrote: Tony Mancill tmanc...@debian.org writes: * The Original Code is JavaCC. The Initial Developer of the Original * Code is Sun Microsystems, Inc. Portions Copyright 1996-2002 Sun * Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved

LGPL code that includes files licensed under Sun Public License 1.0 - DFSG-free?

2009-08-09 Thread Tony Mancill
, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA. On Debian systems the GNU Lesser General Public License, version 2.1 can be found at /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1. The Debian packaging is copyright 2009, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org and tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org, and is licensed under

Re: LGPL code that includes files licensed under Sun Public License 1.0 - DFSG-free?

2009-08-09 Thread tony mancill
wrote: On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 10:27:27 -0700 Tony Mancill wrote: [...] We are trying to determine the licensing status of a new package, libjxp-java, for which most of the source is licensed under the LGPL, but includes 2 (modified) files for which the original license is the Sun Public License

software licensed under GPLv2 or later and GPLv3 or later

2009-01-31 Thread Tony Mancill
Debian Legal: I'm considering sponsoring an upload of a packaging of mathtex (http://www.forkosh.com/mathtex.html). The upstream README file says that the software is licensed under GPLv2 or later, while the comments in the source file indicates that it is licensed under GPLv3 or later. The