Re: [Fedora-legal-list] The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)

2019-03-18 Thread Richard Fontana
> > On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 3:36 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > Is it necessary that an open source license must allow porting to > > proprietary systems? I don't think so today. But based on what I > > found out about the OpenMotif license, people actually thought that > > back then. This surpr

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)

2018-10-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 3:36 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > Is it necessary that an open source license must allow porting to > proprietary systems? I don't think so today. But based on what I > found out about the OpenMotif license, people actually thought that > back then. This surprises me. Has

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)

2018-10-26 Thread Florian Weimer
* Adam Jackson: > On Thu, 2018-10-25 at 22:56 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Motif has since been released under the LGPL, so this is largely >> of historic interest. >> >> Was the license of OpenMotif ever submitted to OSI? >> >> >> >> Debian cl

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License)

2018-10-26 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2018-10-25 at 22:56 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Motif has since been released under the LGPL, so this is largely > of historic interest. > > Was the license of OpenMotif ever submitted to OSI? > > > > Debian clearly considered it non-DFS