Hi,
our package msv-xsdlib [1] has been refused even from non-free due to
license issues. Hence I've contacted the upstream developer (from Sun) and
got the answer below.
As I understand from different discussions that the CDDL license in
critical in regard to "freeness", I have some questions:
1
Hello,
I sent the below email already a while ago, but didn't receive any answer.
Can someone tell me what's wrong? Did I miss some important point of
netiquette, or FAQ to read before asking stupid questions?
Thanks, Eric
Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
Hi,
our package msv-xsdlib [1] has been
"Eric Lavarde - Debian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I sent the below email already a while ago, but didn't receive any answer.
Can someone tell me what's wrong? Did I miss some important point of
netiquette, or FAQ to read before asking stupid questions?
Hello again,
Last tentative: what's wrong with my request that I don't get _any_ answer?
We have contacts within Sun with good will, we've got here a chance to
influence (employees from) Sun with constructive remarks, but I need
someone knowledgeable who helps me on the legal side, and tells me w
Eric Lavarde - Debian [Fri Sep 22, 2006 at 01:52:43PM +0200]:
> Hello again,
>
> Last tentative: what's wrong with my request that I don't get _any_ answer?
You did get an answer - check message from Joe Smith [Thu Sep 14, 2006
at 02:05:13PM -0400].
I agree with Joe, and believe that a CDDL lice
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:21:18 +1000 Nic Suzor wrote:
> Eric Lavarde - Debian [Fri Sep 22, 2006 at 01:52:43PM +0200]:
> > Hello again,
> >
> > Last tentative: what's wrong with my request that I don't get _any_
> > answer?
>
> You did get an answer - check message from Joe Smith [Thu Sep 14, 2006
Hi,
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:21:18 +1000 Nic Suzor wrote:
>
>> Eric Lavarde - Debian [Fri Sep 22, 2006 at 01:52:43PM +0200]:
>> > Hello again,
>> >
>> > Last tentative: what's wrong with my request that I don't get _any_
>> > answer?
>>
>> You did get an answer - check message from Joe Smith [Thu
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:31:21 +0200 (MEST) Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
[> Francesco Poli wrote]
> > Maybe another person who recommends the GPL could be useful to add
> > "pressure" to adopt a DFSG-free licensing scheme... I don't know...
> Neither do I, but if I manage to change Sun's opinion, I
On Sep 7, 2006, at 14:59, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
Background of question 3 is that someone on the list might have an
idea
which other license could be acceptable to Sun (and I might suggest
it to
the developer).
msv itself is under the new three-point BSD license plus a nuclear
faci
Hi,
sorry that I answer so late but I was privately and professionally under
time pressure.
> On Sep 7, 2006, at 14:59, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
>
>> Background of question 3 is that someone on the list might have an
>> idea
>> which other license could be acceptable to Sun (and I might sugge
10 matches
Mail list logo
