On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:34:18PM -0700, Justin Patrin wrote:
> On 8/23/05, Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 August 2005 05:46 pm, Joe Stump wrote:
> > > I agree. I never understood why we used the PHP license over, say,
> > > the BSD or LGPL (which both fit library level type
Can you please make this another thread, this is outside the scope of
the original message :)
Arnaud.
Ian Eure wrote:
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 09:34 pm, Justin Patrin wrote:
On 8/23/05, Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 05:46 pm, Joe Stump wrote:
On 8/23/05, Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 August 2005 05:46 pm, Joe Stump wrote:
> > I agree. I never understood why we used the PHP license over, say,
> > the BSD or LGPL (which both fit library level type code a lot better
> > IMO). To have the license require distribution o
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 09:34 pm, Justin Patrin wrote:
> On 8/23/05, Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 August 2005 05:46 pm, Joe Stump wrote:
> > > I agree. I never understood why we used the PHP license over, say,
> > > the BSD or LGPL (which both fit library level type code
4 matches
Mail list logo