Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

2005-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:34:18PM -0700, Justin Patrin wrote: > On 8/23/05, Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 August 2005 05:46 pm, Joe Stump wrote: > > > I agree. I never understood why we used the PHP license over, say, > > > the BSD or LGPL (which both fit library level type

Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

2005-08-23 Thread Arnaud Limbourg
Can you please make this another thread, this is outside the scope of the original message :) Arnaud. Ian Eure wrote: On Tuesday 23 August 2005 09:34 pm, Justin Patrin wrote: On 8/23/05, Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 23 August 2005 05:46 pm, Joe Stump wrote:

Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

2005-08-23 Thread Justin Patrin
On 8/23/05, Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 23 August 2005 05:46 pm, Joe Stump wrote: > > I agree. I never understood why we used the PHP license over, say, > > the BSD or LGPL (which both fit library level type code a lot better > > IMO). To have the license require distribution o

Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

2005-08-23 Thread Ian Eure
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 09:34 pm, Justin Patrin wrote: > On 8/23/05, Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 August 2005 05:46 pm, Joe Stump wrote: > > > I agree. I never understood why we used the PHP license over, say, > > > the BSD or LGPL (which both fit library level type code