Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So whats the verdict?
I take it that this is neither DFSG or GPL compatable?
It is definitely GPL incompatible, although there may be some
disagreement about what causes this. The easiest way to solve this is
to dual license it under this license and the
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 07:33:53PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Selling the library is not forbidden.
Really? You may not charge a fee for this Ada library itself.
Allowing a reasonable copying fee but saying that you can't charge for
the library itself doesn't, AFAIK, make the license fail
So whats the verdict?
I take it that this is neither DFSG or GPL compatable?
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:49:14PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(please CC responses to me thanks; sorry if this has already been
raised; I searched the archives but found nothing)
for more details.
You should have received a copy of the Ada Community
License with this library, in the file named Ada Community
License or ACL. If not, contact the author of this library
for a copy.
--
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(please CC responses to me thanks; sorry if this has already been
raised; I searched the archives but found nothing)
Any thoughts on this license?
Is it DFSG?
Yes, I think so.
Is it compatable with the GPL?
Maybe not. Section 7 says
7
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:49:14PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
If you have any influence, changing this part to read more like the
GPL would be enough to make it compatible.
I'm curious. This license seems to have other restrictions over the
GPL.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:19:29AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
The written offer for source code is an allowable option under 3(a) of
the Ada license. It say that you must make your modifications
... Freely Available. Freely Available, as defined in the license,
can include shipping and
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:19:29AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
The written offer for source code is an allowable option under 3(a) of
the Ada license. It say that you must make your modifications
... Freely Available. Freely Available, as defined in
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2 You may apply bug fixes, portability fixes and other
modifications derived from the Public Domain or from
the Copyright Holder. A library modified in such a way
shall still be considered the Standard Version.
Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Selling the library is not forbidden.
Really? You may not charge a fee for this Ada library itself.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 11:21:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
3 You may otherwise modify your copy of this Ada library
in any way, provided that you insert a prominent notice
in each changed file stating how and when you changed
that file,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:19:29AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
Selling the library is not forbidden. The definition of reasonable
copying fee is vague enough that it doesn't restrict you any more
than the GPL. You can also charge whatever you want for support.
This is Debian's interpretation
Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 09:19:29AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
Selling the library is not forbidden. The definition of reasonable
copying fee is vague enough that it doesn't restrict you any more
than the GPL. You can also charge whatever you want
13 matches
Mail list logo
