Hi,
there were several threads around AGPL recently, mostly re-stirred due
to Horracle using AGPLv3 for Berkeley DB.
I was unable to follow them totally and remember there being raised at
least two points:
• The inability to provide security support for AGPL software
(embargoed fixes)/
• The
On Aug 27, 2013 8:15 AM, "Thorsten Glaser" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> there were several threads around AGPL recently, mostly re-stirred due
> to Horracle using AGPLv3 for Berkeley DB.
>
> I was unable to follow them totally and remember there being raised at
> least two points:
>
> • The inability to pro
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:00:10 -0400 Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2013 8:15 AM, "Thorsten Glaser" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > there were several threads around AGPL recently, mostly re-stirred due
> > to Horracle using AGPLv3 for Berkeley DB.
> >
[...]
In the recent discussions, the main
Francesco Poli paranoici.org> writes:
> In the recent discussions, the main concerns were about the switch of a
Yes, I know, but the discussion was raised, so I wanted to make sure.
> > > So, is AGPLv3 still acceptable for main?
> For the record, I personally disagree with their conclusion:
F
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:15:25 + (UTC) Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Francesco Poli paranoici.org> writes:
[...]
> > > > So, is AGPLv3 still acceptable for main?
>
> > For the record, I personally disagree with their conclusion:
>
> Francesco, I specifically did *not* ask for your personal opinion
On 29/08/13 16:15, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Francesco, [stuff]
Look, there's a command in email software for sending a reply to one
person. "Reply to List" or "Reply to All" is not it - if anyone is
going to lecture others on how "to improve your communication
behaviour", start by using the corre
MJ Ray writes:
> Look, […]
My reply was specifically to this newsgroup,
a long-needed “request” to shut up, and explicitly *not*
soliciting *your* personal(!) opinion on those licences
either. I do not require the “added value”, and this
newsgroup is spammed enough by the likes of you two.
Besid
On 01/09/13 18:12, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> //mirabilos (with backing from other DDs in this group, by private mail)
Well, I'm a DD too, I don't back that sort of disrespectful, sarcastic,
uncollaborative, overlong rant and yes, lurkers support me by email too!
I'll accept that the link to 2008 w
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 12:33 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 01/09/13 18:12, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> //mirabilos (with backing from other DDs in this group, by private mail)
>
> Well, I'm a DD too, I don't back that sort of disrespectful, sarcastic,
> uncollaborative, overlong rant and yes, lurkers suppor
Paul Wise debian.org> writes:
> Likewise. I don't appreciate the disrespectful tone some folks have
> displayed in this and other recent threads. I would like to remind
Oh great, and who’s going to deal with trolls then? You’re not
holding Francesco to them, I’m noticing.
I’ve heard that France
On 02/09/13 12:14, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Paul Wise debian.org> writes:
>> Likewise. I don't appreciate the disrespectful tone some folks have
>> displayed in this and other recent threads. I would like to remind
>
> Oh great, and who’s going to deal with trolls then? You’re not
> holding Franc
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013 17:12:46 + (UTC) Thorsten Glaser wrote:
[...]
> Francesco Poli paranoici.org> writes:
>
> > You asked whether it's still acceptable for Debian main: I answered by
> > describing what the FTP Masters think
>
> Look, as I said above, that was 2008. Not the recent discussion
MJ Ray phonecoop.coop> writes:
> Well, we "hear" things like that every time someone doesn't agree about
In this case I talked with other DDs on IRC.
> whether software follows the DFSG or not, yet the number of subscribers
> seems to be generally increasing towards some asymptote
> http://list
On 02/09/13 21:27, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> MJ Ray phonecoop.coop> writes:
>> > whether software follows the DFSG or not, yet the number of subscribers
>> > seems to be generally increasing towards some asymptote
>> > http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-legal.png
> You know that l.d.o is not the
14 matches
Mail list logo
