On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 03:10:35PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 14:26, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:03:13AM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 17:03, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:39:51AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 17:03, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:39:51AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
We also have essentially the same license with ttf-bitstream-vera.
IMO, that isn't Free Software, either.
There are no practical restrictions on its freedom; I fail to see how
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 14:26, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:03:13AM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 17:03, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:39:51AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
We also have essentially the same license with
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 11:39:51AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
We also have essentially the same license with ttf-bitstream-vera.
IMO, that isn't Free Software, either.
--
G. Branden Robinson| One doesn't have a sense of humor.
Debian GNU/Linux | It has
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:05:57PM -0400, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
Has anybody asked Sun for a clarification of the license, or tried to
obtain the code under a different license? Or maybe the FSF has
obtained a suitable license and just forgot to update the copyright
notice?
Sun has
5 matches
Mail list logo
