Open-Xchange 0.8.2 CC+GPL license

2006-06-03 Thread Balint Reczey
. In the current stable version (0.8.2), the web interface is released under CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 license and it had some response from the community around open-xchange. Now, the Open-XChange website contains a legal disclaimer that extends the CC license and defines noncommercial

Re: Open-Xchange 0.8.2 CC+GPL license

2006-06-03 Thread Walter Landry
Balint Reczey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So please comment it wether the CC license + disclaimer allows the inclusion of the open-xchange package in the official Debian packages in the non-free section. The disclaimer, by itself, is not a problem for non-free. It does not create any problems

Re: CC-BY license.

2005-03-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:24:35AM -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote: The license doesn't say that the name must be prominent. It says that it must be at least as prominent as other credit. Last week I asked the cc-community list if I could just have an appendix titled contributors and put

Re: CC-BY license.

2005-03-09 Thread Daniel Carrera
Andrew Suffield wrote: The third justification refers to the trademark notice on the license's website where it is not obvious if this notice is part of the license. I'm pretty sure the trademarrk notice is not part of the license. So were we (expecting this to be a trivial bug which

Re: CC-BY license.

2005-03-09 Thread MJ Ray
Daniel Carrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Suffield wrote: So were we (expecting this to be a trivial bug which would be rapidly corrected), but when they were asked we got a non-response and it hasn't been fixed *years later*, which made us rather less sure. Alright, let me have a go