Are there packages in non-free that have special permission for
Debian? Do you know any of their names? I was worried about some
practical problems, but am willing to be swayed by precedent.
I believe Netscape 4.x is a prime example: Upstream provides binaries
only. Only
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:44:50PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
So, are there any other packages that specifically mention Debian?
ines.
crafty has something comparable.
But I'm not sure why an example is needed. non-free is for
software which we can legally distribute but which doesn't
meet
Hello again,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 03:01:20PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:02:02PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
This is part of my distribution agreement with the
university - I am not allowed to distribute the software to
companies without a fee (which mainly
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:28:05AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
However, you said that the author is resposive. At a minimum, I think
that the paragraph
The tool set can be distributed as part of other non-commercial program
packages, but only in its original, unadapted form. If
However, you said that the author is resposive. At a minimum, I think
that the paragraph
The tool set can be distributed as part of other non-commercial program
packages, but only in its original, unadapted form. If anybody is
interested in providing the tools as integrated part
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 04:39:43PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
I don't think so. Does the author just provide one big, fat,
executable? It sounds like there are other parts with an assumed
directory structure. That would prevent you, for example, from
putting documentation in a separate
Thanks for your answers!
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:07:24PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 04:39:43PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
However, you said that the author is resposive. At a minimum, I think
that the paragraph
The tool set can be distributed as part of
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:02:02PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
This is part of my distribution agreement with the
university - I am not allowed to distribute the software to
companies without a fee (which mainly goes to the university, and
must be priced comparable to other commercial
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:28:05AM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
Are there packages in non-free that have special permission for
Debian? Do you know any of their names? I was worried about some
practical problems, but am willing to be swayed by precedent.
I believe so, yes.
However, I'm not
Hello,
I'd like to package CACTVS, a framework of chemical applications. (so far
mostly a structure editor, but there aren't many decent of those around
for Linux...)
The license is clearly not DFSG-compliant, however, I'd like to know if
I could even upload this to non-free:
--- snip ---
This
1. Commercial stuff is not allowed - I'd say this is the problem of the
user to comply with?
Correct. I believe there are a number of programs in non-free that
have similar restrictions.
2. We can't modify the files. As they are binary only, this won't be
much of a trouble. But can
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 04:39:43PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
However, you said that the author is resposive. At a minimum, I think
that the paragraph
The tool set can be distributed as part of other non-commercial program
packages, but only in its original, unadapted form. If anybody
12 matches
Mail list logo
