Re: Concerns over Modula-3 copyrights.

1999-01-06 Thread Joey Hess
J.H.M. Dassen wrote: > Is it needed for a Debian package? If not, it might be sufficient just to > leave it out of the binary package (and note in the copyright file that it > is problematic, but doesn't affect the binary package). Strictly speaking, you have to leave it out of the source package

Re: Concerns over Modula-3 copyrights.

1999-01-06 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Wed, Jan 06, 1999 at 21:45:49 +1100, Stuart Lamble wrote: > The solver is Copyright (C) 1992, Xerox Corporation. > ^^^ > This is, literally, the whole copyright statement (as far as I can tell) > for this particular file. I vaguely recall that Xer

Concerns over Modula-3 copyrights.

1999-01-06 Thread Stuart Lamble
As you may or may not be aware, I'm busily packaging up Modula-3 for Debian. This took a hit last year, when libc6 was released; the stock Modula-3 distribution doesn't have any support for libc6. The result is that I'm packaging up a modified variant, Polytechnique Modula-3 (aka PM3.) The problem