Hi,
[ Please keep me CC'ed, I'm not subscribed. ]
I packaged nifiticlib, a software that is placed into the public domain.
The source package is available from mentors.d.n:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=nifticlib
The previous version of the above pac
Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [ Please keep me CC'ed, I'm not subscribed. ]
[...]
> I talked to upstream and they replaced those statement with something
> like the following to make their software acceptable for Debian main:
>
> # The immv file was originally part of FSL - FMRIB's Softwar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>How has it 'been placed in the public domain'? I am not aware of any
>way to do that in Oxford besides copyright expiring, or the work somehow
>not qualifying for automatic copyright protection anyway. It may be
>possible to disclaim all copyright interest in a work, bu
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >How has it 'been placed in the public domain'? I am not aware of any
> >way to do that in Oxford besides copyright expiring, or the work somehow
> >not qualifying for automatic copyright protection anyway. It may be
> >possible to dis
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:35:54AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [ Please keep me CC'ed, I'm not subscribed. ]
> [...]
> > I talked to upstream and they replaced those statement with something
> > like the following to make their software acceptable for Debian main:
>
Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Please keep me CC'ed, I'm not subscribed. ]
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:35:54AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Sorry, I think it's ambiguous. The UK Patent Office (www.patent.gov.uk,
> > who also handle much to do with copyright, sadly) sometimes uses 'in the
Michael Hanke wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:35:54AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
>> Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > [ Please keep me CC'ed, I'm not subscribed. ]
>> [...]
>> > I talked to upstream and they replaced those statement with something
>> > like the following to make their softwar
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:40:40 -0400 Nathanael Nerode wrote:
[...]
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:35:54AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
[...]
> >> Please ask them to use a MIT/X11-like licence or similar liberal
> >terms.
> MJ, MIT/Expat is usually preferred to MIT/X11 here. :-) I don't
> remember why; I t
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> MIT/Expat is usually preferred to MIT/X11 here. :-) I don't
> remember why; I think it's more liberal.
It also has the advantage of being (currently) an unambiguous way to
refer to the specific license terms; "the terms of the Expat license"
has onl
9 matches
Mail list logo
