Hi,,,
I am using Crypto Expert 2006 professional Trial
but I have no license so that I can not make lager disk size so You can help me
the license number it.
Thank you very much.
__Bạn Có Sử Dụng Yahoo! Không?Mệt mỏi vì thư rác? Yahoo! Thư c
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the developer(s) and
to the developers mailing list to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you wish to cont
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 02:18:42PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > Yes, from the Artistic License:
>
> However, the Artistic License also has this:
>
> "Reasonable copying fee" is whatever you can just
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Yes, from the Artistic License:
However, the Artistic License also has this:
"Reasonable copying fee" is whatever you can justify on the
basis of media cost, duplication charges, time of people invol
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:20:05AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> >
> > The give away here may be problematic, however see below:
> > > 5. You may charge a reasonable copying fee for any distribution of this
> > > Package. You may charge any fee you choose for support of this Package.
> > > YOU MA
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 05:19:03AM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:26:50PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a
> wrote:
>
> > 1. You may make and give away verbatim copies of the source form of the
> > Standard Version of this Package without restriction, provided
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 05:19:03AM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> The give away here may be problematic, however see below:
> > 5. You may charge a reasonable copying fee for any distribution of this
> > Package. You may charge any fee you choose for support of this Package.
> > YOU MAY NOT CH
I am a little surprised that nobody has replied, so as I am catching up
on my mail I'll take a crack at it:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:26:50PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> (please CC: since I'm not in the list)
>
> I understand that crack's [1] license (adjointed) is free, howev
(please CC: since I'm not in the list)
I understand that crack's [1] license (adjointed) is free, however, I'm
surprised its not in Debian yet (whileas john is). I just wanted to check
before packaging it (there's an ITP #82613 but it's almost 2 years ago),
since it sounds DFSG-compatible to me.
9 matches
Mail list logo
