On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 19:15, Evan Prodromou wrote:
So, I'd like to write a draft summary for the 6 Creative Commons 2.0
licenses:
So, I've started this summary,
http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.sxw
(and, yes, I'll convert it to HTML and plain text ASAP), and I've
included the
On 2004-07-06 20:15:25 +0100 Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
included the three main arguments why Attribution 2.0 is non-free
At least in this context, we should say instead that software released
under it alone will not be free software. It usually doesn't make
sense to say a
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 03:15:25PM -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote:
You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or
publicly digitally perform the Work with any technological
measures that control access or use of the Work in a manner
inconsistent
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 15:47, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-07-06 20:15:25 +0100 Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
included the three main arguments why Attribution 2.0 is non-free
At least in this context, we should say instead that software released
under it alone will not be free
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:18:44PM -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote:
Section 4a) allows the author to forbid reference to the user. Section
4b) requires authorship credit.
If the author uses the revocation clause, it's not explicitly stated
that the licensee is absolved of the requirements in
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 17:18, Evan Prodromou wrote:
Section 4a) allows the author to forbid reference to the user. Section
4b) requires authorship credit.
s/the user/themselves/
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wikitravel (http://wikitravel.org/)
signature.asc
Description: This is
6 matches
Mail list logo
