Re: Creative Commons license summary (version 4)

2005-04-11 Thread Daniel Goldsmith
On Apr 11, 2005 12:21 AM, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.P.S: Am I the only one that sees threads broken by Humberto's replies? > It seems that his MUA sometimes sets "In-Reply-To:" and "References:" > fields to the "Resent-Message-ID:" value of the message he's replying > to, rathe

Re: Creative Commons license summary (version 4)

2005-04-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:29:58 -0300 Humberto Massa wrote: > my suggestion: > > You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly > perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work with > any technological measures that prevent the recipient > from exercising the rig

Re: Creative Commons license summary (version 4)

2005-04-08 Thread Humberto Massa
Francesco Poli wrote: >The one in version 4 seems viable: > >| You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, >|or publicly digitally perform the Work with any technological >|measures that prevent the recipient from exercising the >|rights granted to them by section 8a and section 3 o

Re: Creative Commons license summary (version 4)

2005-04-07 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:09:11 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote: > I think the two big sticking points right now are: > > * _Trademark_. I think we all consider it worth correcting, but > there are some folks who think that the problems aren't sufficient > to consider the CC licenses non-free. I

Re: Creative Commons license summary (version 4)

2005-04-07 Thread Evan Prodromou
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:47:27AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html > > http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.txt > > Would it be possible to put a copy somewhere else while gluck is down? Arg

Re: Creative Commons license summary (version 4)

2005-04-07 Thread Matthew Garrett
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html > http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.txt Would it be possible to put a copy somewhere else while gluck is down? Thanks, -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Creative Commons license summary (version 4)

2005-04-04 Thread Thomas
Francesco Poli wrote: [...] Actually, if CC folk read "software" as "programs and only programs", they will look at | This includes comparing software against the DFSG to determine if the | packages are Free Software. and say "OK, you compare /software/ against the DFSG, but our licenses are not i

Re: Creative Commons license summary (version 4)

2005-04-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:44:08 -0700 Josh Triplett wrote: > Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > * "the acceptability of software and other content" > > > > Content? Which "other content" does Debian distribute besides > > software? If, by "software", you mean non-hardware (as it seems from > > the rest

Re: Creative Commons license summary (version 4)

2005-04-04 Thread Josh Triplett
Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:32:58 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote: >>I've made a new version of the Creative Commons license summary >>available here: >> >> http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html > > Something I didn't notice before: > > * "the acceptability of software an

Re: Creative Commons license summary (version 4)

2005-04-03 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:32:58 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote: > I've made a new version of the Creative Commons license summary > available here: > > http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html Something I didn't notice before: * "the acceptability of software and other content" Content? Wh

Creative Commons license summary (version 4)

2005-04-03 Thread Evan Prodromou
I've made a new version of the Creative Commons license summary available here: http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.txt This version has the following changes since version 3: * Changed "definition" to "criteria" per France