On Apr 11, 2005 12:21 AM, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.P.S: Am I the only one that sees threads broken by Humberto's replies?
> It seems that his MUA sometimes sets "In-Reply-To:" and "References:"
> fields to the "Resent-Message-ID:" value of the message he's replying
> to, rathe
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:29:58 -0300 Humberto Massa wrote:
> my suggestion:
>
> You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly
> perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work with
> any technological measures that prevent the recipient
> from exercising the rig
Francesco Poli wrote:
>The one in version 4 seems viable:
>
>| You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform,
>|or publicly digitally perform the Work with any technological
>|measures that prevent the recipient from exercising the
>|rights granted to them by section 8a and section 3 o
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:09:11 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote:
> I think the two big sticking points right now are:
>
> * _Trademark_. I think we all consider it worth correcting, but
> there are some folks who think that the problems aren't sufficient
> to consider the CC licenses non-free. I
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:47:27AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html
> > http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.txt
>
> Would it be possible to put a copy somewhere else while gluck is down?
Arg
Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html
> http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.txt
Would it be possible to put a copy somewhere else while gluck is down?
Thanks,
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Actually, if CC folk read "software" as "programs and only programs",
they will look at
| This includes comparing software against the DFSG to determine if the
| packages are Free Software.
and say "OK, you compare /software/ against the DFSG, but our licenses
are not i
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 08:44:08 -0700 Josh Triplett wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > * "the acceptability of software and other content"
> >
> > Content? Which "other content" does Debian distribute besides
> > software? If, by "software", you mean non-hardware (as it seems from
> > the rest
Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:32:58 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote:
>>I've made a new version of the Creative Commons license summary
>>available here:
>>
>> http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html
>
> Something I didn't notice before:
>
> * "the acceptability of software an
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 10:32:58 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote:
> I've made a new version of the Creative Commons license summary
> available here:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html
Something I didn't notice before:
* "the acceptability of software and other content"
Content? Wh
I've made a new version of the Creative Commons license summary
available here:
http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html
http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.txt
This version has the following changes since version 3:
* Changed "definition" to "criteria" per France
11 matches
Mail list logo