[...]
BTW, what happened to the non-free font concerns that were expressed by
Branden Robinson in the above-mentioned wiki page?
Maybe what the GNOME foundation has done to use an open font for their
logo can provide some inspiration to the Debian project for a solution
to this long-running
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:56:45 +0100 Nicolas Spalinger wrote:
[...]
I suggest discussing the opportunity of basing the text in the Debian
logo on an existing open font. Or calling on designers to create a new
Debian-specific font from scratch and then release it under a good
license.
I agree
I totally agree with you.
Best option, IMHO, would be to have a new Debian-specific font to be
released under a free license.
Daniele Micci
Messaggio originale
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 20/02/2007 16.56
A: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Ogg: Re: Debian logos and trademarks
[CUT
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:57:13PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
The DFSG refers to copyright licensing, it doesn't cover patents or
trademarks.
It actually doesn't refer to any of them specifically. It does talk
about licensing, but it doesn't
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:57:13PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
The DFSG refers to copyright licensing, it doesn't cover patents or
trademarks.
It actually doesn't refer to any of them specifically. It
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 00:38:34 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 11:57:13PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
The DFSG refers to copyright licensing, it doesn't cover patents
or trademarks.
6 matches
Mail list logo
