On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:34:00AM -0700, tom wrote:
> <> O Martes, 13 de Xullo de 2004 ás 00:56:39 -0700, Sean Kellogg <> > back to B due to lack of communication facilities. The duty in
> <> > will be discharged by the court under section 261 provided section
> <263 is
> <>
> <> 95% of the
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:39:45PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> > On Monday 12 July 2004 11:45 am, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > While the imagery of a computer programmer sitting on a lonely
> > > desert isle hacking away with their solar powered computer,
Andreas Barth wrote:
> That's not true. It's just the other way, the Berne Convention is a
> typical civil law construct.
And a disastrous mistake, but never mind that!
--
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Sean Kellogg wrote:
> On Monday 12 July 2004 11:45 am, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> While the imagery of a computer programmer sitting on a lonely desert
>> isle hacking away with their solar powered computer, drinking
>> coconuts, and recieving messages in bottles might be silly, the rights
>> that su
Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sean Kellogg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040713 10:55]:
> > With great respect to the 95% of the world population that does not live
> > within the US... the great majority of the world does operate under laws
> > derived from the common law system, which is embodied within the
* Sean Kellogg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040713 10:55]:
> With great respect to the 95% of the world population that does not live
> within the US... the great majority of the world does operate under laws
> derived from the common law system, which is embodied within the restatement
> of law (there
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> > [If you could also provide a cite to the 2nd Restatement of
> > Contracts, that would also be appreciated. I'm not quite sure
> > where it falls into the context of US legislation or case laws.]
>
> the restatements are an effort by the American Legal I
* Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040712 21:15]:
> > While the imagery of a computer programmer sitting on a lonely desert
> > isle hacking away with their solar powered computer, drinking
> > coconuts, and recieving messages in bottles might be silly, the rights
> > that such a gedanken is prote
Sean Kellogg wrote:
> Even in the civil law societies
> (most of continental Europe and Japan) the law has been adopted from the
> United States post World War II, especially in the area of contract law where
> global economies have force a homogenization of the law.
In my experience this hom
O Martes, 13 de Xullo de 2004 ás 00:56:39 -0700, Sean Kellogg > back to B due to lack of communication facilities. The duty in
> will be discharged by the court under section 261 provided section
<263 is
<>
<> 95% of the world population does not live in the US.
<
Aconsegueix [EMAIL PROTECT
> Please do.
>
> [If you could also provide a cite to the 2nd Restatement of Contracts,
> that would also be appreciated. I'm not quite sure where it falls into
> the context of US legislation or case laws.]
I'll type up some case sites in the morning... in the mean time, I'll just
say that the
On Tuesday 13 July 2004 01:06 am, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
> O Martes, 13 de Xullo de 2004 ás 00:56:39 -0700, Sean Kellogg escribía:
> > back to B due to lack of communication facilities. The duty in question
> > will be discharged by the court under section 261 provided section 263 is
>
> 95% of the
O Martes, 13 de Xullo de 2004 ás 00:56:39 -0700, Sean Kellogg escribía:
> back to B due to lack of communication facilities. The duty in question will
> be discharged by the court under section 261 provided section 263 is
95% of the world population does not live in the US.
--
Tarrío
(C
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> Programmer A receives code while on a desert island with a mostly
> DFSG license attached to it that requires modification of the source
> be sent back upstream (DUTY) to greedy corporation B. A modifies
> the source, allowing him to eventually construct
On Monday 12 July 2004 11:39 pm, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the logic behind this.[1] Could you perhaps
> elucidate and provide references to case law?
>
> I would imagine that you could get terms of a contract that were
> impossible to fulfill thrown out, but I've not aware of a
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> On Monday 12 July 2004 11:45 am, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > While the imagery of a computer programmer sitting on a lonely
> > desert isle hacking away with their solar powered computer,
> > drinking coconuts, and recieving messages in bottles might be
> > s
On Monday 12 July 2004 11:45 am, Don Armstrong wrote:
> While the imagery of a computer programmer sitting on a lonely desert
> isle hacking away with their solar powered computer, drinking
> coconuts, and recieving messages in bottles might be silly, the rights
> that such a gedanken is protecting
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Raul Miller wrote:
> the above paragraphs have little relevance to anyone in debian. The
> technical term for this condition is "silly".
This particular test is basically expressing the idea that individuals
shouldn't be compelled to distribute changes to individuals beyond t
18 matches
Mail list logo
