On 01/03/15 00:05, Riley Baird wrote:
Or they could keep the files from Nokia under LGPL2.1, and use
GPL3+openssl exception for the rest of the files. Given that they have
proper headers, I don't see a problem with that, although I would
mention that in the readme.
But what license would the wor
> Or they could keep the files from Nokia under LGPL2.1, and use
> GPL3+openssl exception for the rest of the files. Given that they have
> proper headers, I don't see a problem with that, although I would
> mention that in the readme.
But what license would the work as a whole be distributed a
On 28/02/15 02:31, Riley Baird wrote:
Hi -legal!
I was reviewing a package "classified-ads" for Debian, and I noticed a
potential problem in the process. Namely, the author of the program has decided to use
GPL3 with the OpenSSL exception. However, they have taken some files from Nokia which a
Hi -legal!
I was reviewing a package "classified-ads" for Debian, and I noticed a
potential problem in the process. Namely, the author of the program has decided
to use GPL3 with the OpenSSL exception. However, they have taken some files
from Nokia which are dual licensed under either LGPL2.1 o
4 matches
Mail list logo
