Re: GCJ vs. Kaffe linking [was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe]

2005-01-16 Thread Raul Miller
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 09:53:16AM -0500, Michael Poole wrote: > If you use Eclipse with a JVM, then to the extent that a combined work > is created, it is created by the user or by the JVM. For the record, I disagree with this line of reasoning. I think it's misleading, and I see no need for it.

Re: GCJ vs. Kaffe linking [was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe]

2005-01-16 Thread Michael Poole
Grzegorz B. Prokopski writes: > " Linking this library statically or dynamically with other modules > is making a combined work based on this library. Thus, the terms > and conditions of the GNU General Public License cover the whole > combination." > > The difference between Kaffe and GCJ

GCJ vs. Kaffe linking [was: Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe]

2005-01-15 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
On Sat, 2005-15-01 at 22:37 +, Dalibor Topic wrote: > Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > > > Again, this isn't about the copyright holder's right to control > > production of derived works. This is about the copyright holder's > > right to control copying and distribution of copies. Reading GPL 2