On 1/27/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/27/06, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/27/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What argument?
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00475.html
>
> Edwards has already explained it t
On 1/27/06, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> anything, is there some reason I should continue replying?
You can't read. Stop replying. Drop an email to Judge Saris telling
her that you can't read and asking her to phone you back.
regards,
alexander.
Raul Miller wrote:
On 1/27/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
A "question of law" is addressed by "likelihood of success on that
portion breach of contract claim that concerns its trademark"
Which question of law is are you talking about here? What do you
mean by "portio
On 1/28/06, Pedro A.D.Rezende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Like, say, "ordered set of instructions" to mean "computer program"
Hey Prof., how about "a series of instructions"?
>
> > If you won't write something that means
> > anything, is there some reason I should continue replying?
>
> Fe
4 matches
Mail list logo
