On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:01:15PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> It is not very bad thing if we can't create archives in formats like
> ACE, ARJ, LHA or RAR with free software. But it is more important to
Ideally, amavis needs access for all archive formats so it can check
for viruses in E-Ma
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
>
> When I run command "vrms" in my Debian GNU/Linux, most of those non-free
> packages it finds are packers and/or unpackers. How about you? I like to
>
There may be patent issues. I'd check with the authors of the archivers.
Additionally reading the
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:01:15PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
> When I run command "vrms" in my Debian GNU/Linux, most of those non-free
> packages it finds are packers and/or unpackers.
While not the best team in their league, I think you'll find that even
the Packers aren't so bad that the
> So, where is that public-domain software for extracting ZOO-files?
> Somebody must find it and then create Debian-package of it. IMHO
> creating new ZOO-archives is not very important for us.
IIRC, the ZOO extracters were Ooz and Looz.
When I run command "vrms" in my Debian GNU/Linux, most of those non-free
packages it finds are packers and/or unpackers. How about you? I like to
listen to music modules made under Amiga and many of those modules are
distributed in Aminet as LHA-archives. Sometimes I use DOS and its
software may b
5 matches
Mail list logo
