Hi,
I intend to package IBM's ICU for Debian, and their license is the same that
is advertised on http://www.research.ibm.com/jikes/license/license3.htm,
except that it says ICU instead of Jikes. Their Web site says (see
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/icu/project/):
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 01:34:16PM -0700, Yves Arrouye wrote:
> Also, if that license is OK, should I package it with ICU, or should I try
> to get it included in base-files?
Why would you include it in base-files? It's not exactly a common license.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http/ftp:
> Why would you include it in base-files? It's not exactly a
> common license.
I'm just asking :) It's not a common license but the number of licenses that
Debian agrees with is not that big either, so it may be a good idea to put
them here. That will also help new maintainers know which license
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 01:41:32PM -0700, Yves Arrouye wrote:
> I'm just asking :) It's not a common license but the number of licenses that
> Debian agrees with is not that big either, so it may be a good idea to put
> them here.
Actually, the number of licenses Debian agrees with is pretty larg
4 matches
Mail list logo