I'm only going to comment where I disagree with or want to amplify Mr.
Nerode.
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 04:36:24PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Such reproduction must be accompanied by the following credit
line: Reprinted by permission from International Business
Machines
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 07:21:56PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
I have problems interpreting the following copyright statement which
covers the documenting of the ICU library from IBM (which itself is
free). IMHO it is non-free, however it is full of juristical english and
may be acceptable for
Hello,
I have problems interpreting the following copyright statement which
covers the documenting of the ICU library from IBM (which itself is
free). IMHO it is non-free, however it is full of juristical english and
may be acceptable for main if one can extract the relevant parts from
all the
Scripsit Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMHO it is non-free, however it is full of juristical english and
may be acceptable for main if one can extract the relevant parts from
all the blah, blah.
No, this parts pretty much kills everything without even trying to
make sense of the rest:
Eduard Bloch wrote:
Hello,
I have problems interpreting the following copyright statement which
covers the documenting of the ICU library from IBM (which itself is
free). IMHO it is non-free, however it is full of juristical english and
may be acceptable for main if one can extract the
5 matches
Mail list logo
