ot;Dexter" Roszatycki
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 11:52:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Debian Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: ITP: pine (?)
Re
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Could anybody explain pine licence?
What exactly do you want to see explained?
> Redistribution of this release is permitted as follows, or by mutual
> agreement: [...]
I understand this in the sense that "this release" is the (unmodified)
version b
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Santiago Vila wrote:
> What exactly do you want to see explained?
>
> > Redistribution of this release is permitted as follows, or by mutual
> > agreement: [...]
>
> I understand this in the sense that "this release" is the (unmodified)
> version by UW.
This licence doesn't f
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 12:30:39PM +0100, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> This licence doesn't forbid to redistribute modified binaries.
This is irrelevant. The important thing is that it does not explicitly
allow redistribution of modified binaries.
> "This release" could be modified release, IMHO.
Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The license doesn't tell about modified binaries,
And therefore they are not allowed. An author has exclusive rights
to do just about everything with his work unless he *explicitly*
allows others to do it.
--
Henning Makholm
5 matches
Mail list logo