On 27 Jul 2000, Henning Makholm wrote:
Under the GPL, I must give the *rights* to everyone, because those who
recive the program from me can pass it on to anyone, and this anyone
also get full rights to my modifications. Essentially GPL says:
1) you must give your source to those you give
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 12:05:27PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
Essentially GPL says:
1) you must give your source to those you give binaries, but
2) you must give your rights to everyone.
I understood, that you have only give rights to all these, that receive
source or binaries
Scripsit Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 27 Jul 2000, Henning Makholm wrote:
Under the GPL, I must give the *rights* to everyone, because those who
recive the program from me can pass it on to anyone, and this anyone
also get full rights to my modifications. Essentially GPL says:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 08:52:28PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
They not only want to have you patches for free, they also want you to
give your copyrights to them. ILLEGAL.
Not nice, but in which jurisdictions do you think it is actually illegal?
Tomasz appears to have issues with
On 26 Jul 2000, Henning Makholm wrote:
No, they *require* that the licensee licence his modification to
them, which is legal enough. In a sense, the GPL also says something
similar: roughly, if you distribute modifications, you must give us
(and everyone else, by the way) the same rights to
Scripsit Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 26 Jul 2000, Henning Makholm wrote:
In a sense, the GPL also says something similar: roughly, if you
distribute modifications, you must give us (and everyone else, by
the way) the same rights to your modifications as we give you to
the
L PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Licence of SteelBlue
Date: 26 Jul 2000 22:02:06 +0200
Scripsit Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nothing in copyright law allow you to make such claims in a license.
A "license" means two things:
1.
Scripsit Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QUOTE :
b. All distributed modifications to the Program shall immediately
become subject to a permanent non-exclusive royalty-free right
hereby granted to TCG to include such modifications in the
Program as it may determine
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 08:52:28PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QUOTE :
b. All distributed modifications to the Program shall immediately
^
become subject to a permanent non-exclusive
Scripsit Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nothing in copyright law allow you to make such claims in a license.
A license means two things:
1. The permission from the owner of an intellectual property right
for someone to do whatever the IPR protects.
2. The contract in which the owner
@lists.debian.org,
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Licence of SteelBlue
Date: 26 Jul 2000 22:02:06 +0200
Scripsit Tomasz Wegrzanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nothing in copyright law allow you to make such claims in a license.
A license means two things:
1. The permission from
I just found this kewl software and it claims to be Open-Source.
http://www.steelblue.com/
Well, here is its licence:
http://www.steelblue.com/sb/download/SteelBlue/latest/LICENSE.TXT
What you think about?
--
Juhapekka naula Tolvanen * U of Jyväskylä * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:27:39AM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
I just found this kewl software and it claims to be Open-Source.
http://www.steelblue.com/
Well, here is its licence:
http://www.steelblue.com/sb/download/SteelBlue/latest/LICENSE.TXT
What you think about?
Quick
13 matches
Mail list logo
