Terry Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
A court is going to consider what the apparent intent was -- not try to
stretch the meaning beyond the obvious.
Intent is not written on the paper.
It seemed obvious to me that this clause hinders binaries.
It seemed obvious to Florian Weimer that it
Terry Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, what I *said* is that tools are not materials, which they are
not -- at least not unless you use them as such. If you build a house
out of hammers, *then* the hammers are materials, otherwise, they are
tools.
So, to be clear: you would claim that if
MJ Ray wrote:
Terry Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, what I *said* is that tools are not materials, which they are
not -- at least not unless you use them as such. If you build a house
out of hammers, *then* the hammers are materials, otherwise, they are
tools.
So, to be clear: you would
Martin Millnert wrote:
7. no permission is granted to distribute, publicly display, or publicly
perform modifications to the Distribution made using proprietary materials
that cannot be released in source format under conditions of this license;
Section 7 seems suspicious.
Isn't that just
Martin Millnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
7. no permission is granted to distribute, publicly display, or publicly
perform modifications to the Distribution made using proprietary materials
that cannot be released in source format under conditions of this license;
[...]
Section 7 seems
MJ Ray wrote:
Martin Millnert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
7. no permission is granted to distribute, publicly display, or publicly
perform modifications to the Distribution made using proprietary materials
that cannot be released in source format under conditions of this license;
[...]
Terry Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MJ Ray wrote:
7. no permission is granted to distribute, publicly display, or publicly
perform modifications to the Distribution made using proprietary materials
that cannot be released in source format under conditions of this license;
Is this saying
MJ Ray wrote:
Terry Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, in your opinion, houses are not made using tools and binary packages
are not made using compilers?
No, what I *said* is that tools are not materials, which they are
not -- at least not unless you use them as such. If you build a house
out of
Hello Debian Legal,
I stumbled upon a package, lft, and noticed that the distributed
packaged was somewhat of age. I looked it up and found quite updated
source at the program developers webpage [1]. So I pondered over why
this is not included; maybe the package maintainer is just asleep. Then
9 matches
Mail list logo
