Re: License determination

1999-03-05 Thread Raul Miller
> > BaseSoftware is under GPL (GNU Public License). ... > > Small addition to GPL > > > > You may not remove the Designed by Obsidian link from the logon > > screen, bypass the logon screen, remove or hide links to the "About" > > box or remove the original author details from the code. - - - Sni

Re: License determination

1999-03-05 Thread Paul Nathan Puri
thanks... NatePuri Certified Law Student & Debian GNU/Linux Monk McGeorge School of Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ompages.com On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Randy Edwards wrote: > > Can some one send me a copy of this license? > >I posted this here once, but you must've missed it Paul. Here is > Obsi

Re: License determination

1999-03-05 Thread Henning Makholm
Brian Ristuccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This sounds a lot like Yes, but only the sound of it. GPL's: | you must cause it, when started running for such | interactive use in the most ordinary way, implies that if I read through the manuals and know who made the thing and know there's no wa

Re: License determination

1999-03-04 Thread Randy Edwards
> Can some one send me a copy of this license? I posted this here once, but you must've missed it Paul. Here is Obsidian's license: - - - Snip - - - Copyright BaseSoftware is under GPL (GNU Public License). The source code is distributed together with the object code for your convenien

Re: License determination

1999-03-04 Thread Paul Nathan Puri
Can some one send me a copy of this license? NatePuri Certified Law Student & Debian GNU/Linux Monk McGeorge School of Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ompages.com On 3 Mar 1999, John Hasler wrote: > Brian Ristuccia writes: > > This sounds a lot like > [GPL splash screen clause] > > Notice the 'if'

Re: License determination

1999-03-04 Thread Paul Nathan Puri
I'd like to know more about this. I'm aware of ocs, and their bundle of web based office stuff. It's good stuff, what are the legal concerns here? I'd really like to see this bundle in debian... NatePuri Certified Law Student & Debian GNU/Linux Monk McGeorge School of Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] htt

Re: License determination

1999-03-04 Thread John Hasler
> Thus the program's output is html and the GPL restriction/addition is a > hypertext link on the login screen of the system and a similar link in > the about screen. This link points to ocs' own web page. So the restriction is on the output of the programs? -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joh

Re: License determination

1999-03-04 Thread Randy Edwards
> If he's simply trying to keep his name and copyright from being removed from > the about screen, or prevent links to the about screen from being removed, > this clause is probably unneccessary. I should explain more. The author's purpose, I'm relatively sure, is to get a bit of attention/cre

Re: License determination

1999-03-04 Thread John Hasler
Brian Ristuccia writes: > This sounds a lot like [GPL splash screen clause] Notice the 'if's in the GPL clause. If my derivative of a GPL program is either non-interactive or displays no announcement, I need not display a GPL announcement. I am free to use bits of emacs in a daemon or embedded s

Re: License determination

1999-03-04 Thread John Hasler
Randy Edwards quotes: > The source code is distributed together with the object code for your > convenience. You may update the code and contribute back to the master > project. He would seem to be saying that you may not distribute derivatives, but may only send them to him. Non-free. > You may

Re: License determination

1999-03-04 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 05:46:08PM -0500, Randy Edwards wrote: > > These licenses are close to the 'edge' of what we consider free. > >Yes, I know what you mean. IMHO, it's a contrib or non-free type > package but I just wanted to get some more feedback on this. Here's the > appropriate chun

Re: License determination

1999-03-03 Thread Randy Edwards
> These licenses are close to the 'edge' of what we consider free. Yes, I know what you mean. IMHO, it's a contrib or non-free type package but I just wanted to get some more feedback on this. Here's the appropriate chunk of the license: - - - Snip - - - Copyright BaseSoftware is under

Re: License determination

1999-03-03 Thread John Hasler
Randy Edwards writes: > Specifically, the packages are GPL with an additional restriction that a > hypertext link to the author's site must remain on one html screen. > Would these packages be able to go into main or would they have to go > into contrib (or non-free)? If they can't go into main th

Re: License determination

1999-03-03 Thread Jules Bean
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Randy Edwards wrote: >I'm toying with the idea of packaging ocs, a set of web-based > applications. The question I have is about the license. Ocs is packaged with > one of those GPL "plus a bit" type of licenses. > >Specifically, the packages are GPL with an addition

License determination

1999-03-03 Thread Randy Edwards
I'm toying with the idea of packaging ocs, a set of web-based applications. The question I have is about the license. Ocs is packaged with one of those GPL "plus a bit" type of licenses. Specifically, the packages are GPL with an additional restriction that a hypertext link to the author's