(Sent to debian-legal, Cc to package maintainer)
I found this package in Incoming. I'm not sure if we can distribute
it; clause 4 is a bit funny. Also, it seems to permit distribution of
derived works BUT NOT verbatim copies ("nontransferable license"),
which is weird.
The mrouted program is
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 01:37:25PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> At the time
> LICENSEE provides a copy of a derivative version of the Program to a
> third party, LICENSEE shall provide STANFORD with one copy of the source
> code of the derivative version at no charge to STANFORD.
This looks li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho writes:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 01:37:25PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > At the time
> > LICENSEE provides a copy of a derivative version of the Program to a
> > third party, LICENSEE shall provide STANFORD with one copy of the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Richard Braakman writes:
> (Sent to debian-legal, Cc to package maintainer)
>
> I found this package in Incoming. I'm not sure if we can distribute
> it; clause 4 is a bit funny. Also, it seems to permit distribution of
> derived works BUT NOT verbatim co
Richard Braakman writes:
> Also, it seems to permit distribution of derived works BUT NOT verbatim
> copies ("nontransferable license"), which is weird.
It certainly is weird.
And quotes:
> 1. STANFORD grants to LICENSEE a nonexclusive and nontransferable license
> to use, copy and modify the co
Christoph writes:
> If I make some modifications, they want to have a copy from me, but
> not from all the users.
I'm sure that is what they intended, but it isn't what they say in the
license. Do you have this in writing from them?
It's still postcardware.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joh
Christoph writes:
> As I understand it, they permit distribution of devired works, but they
> do not speak about REdestribution of the original. I think, they take
> this as granted.
They may take it for granted, but we can't. We can only do what they have
given us permission to do.
--
John Hasl
> Christoph writes:
> > As I understand it, they permit distribution of devired works, but they
> > do not speak about REdestribution of the original. I think, they take
> > this as granted.
>
> They may take it for granted, but we can't. We can only do what they have
> given us permission to d
8 matches
Mail list logo
