Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark

2004-03-06 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:01:42PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 12:26:55PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We consider the former to be DFSG-free and the latter to be

Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark

2004-03-05 Thread Matthew Palmer
[This is so utterly -legal's territory. It's going over there] On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:41:23PM +1100, George Dekavalas wrote: Today I received this email from [EMAIL PROTECTED], so lets hope this helps [...] We definitely want to work with the Debian project such that Debian includes a

Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark

2004-03-05 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 05:13:51PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: [This is so utterly -legal's territory. It's going over there] And what's more, we just *had* this discussion in the past couple of days. It's even part of the same thread. On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 01:41:23PM +1100, George

Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark

2004-03-05 Thread Brian Thomas Sniffen
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We consider the former to be DFSG-free and the latter to be non-free (and require explicit permission to do the latter from the copyright holder). That's all there is to it. I can't imagine why Mozilla would want to forbid this, other than a total

Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark

2004-03-05 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 12:26:55PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We consider the former to be DFSG-free and the latter to be non-free (and require explicit permission to do the latter from the copyright holder). That's all there is to it. I

Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark

2004-03-05 Thread Brian Thomas Sniffen
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 12:26:55PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We consider the former to be DFSG-free and the latter to be non-free (and require explicit permission to do the latter from the

Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark

2004-03-05 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:01:42PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 12:26:55PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: As a consequence of the above, even if we did have a copyright license to modify the icon or the bitmap of

Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark

2004-02-29 Thread Miles Bader
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, for example Debian Iceweasel -- Based on the Mozilla Firefox code is a perfectly legit usage of a trademark. Oh, `Debian Iceweasel'... I kinda like that ... -Miles -- Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over,

Re: Mozilla Firefox's icon and trademark

2004-02-27 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I received a rather disturbing email from Andre Dahlqvist (quoted below with URLs) today that I'm having trouble with, and I'd like opinions and advice on how to proceed. debian-legal might be a better forum for this, but I think it has some deep