Re: New program based on 2 differently-licensed previous ones

2008-02-21 Thread Sebastian Krause
"Cameron Dale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) Can I release the entire program under the GPL? > > 2) Do I NEED to make reference to the other works? Should I? > > 3) Can I remove the headers in the files that I have modified that > state the original authors and licenses of the files? I also reco

Re: new program based on 2 differently-licensed previous ones

2008-02-18 Thread Cameron Dale
[Sorry for the delay in replying, I forgot to mention to CC me as I am not subscribed.] > Which MIT license? MIT have released programs under several different > licenses. Even X11 has been released under different (incompatible) > licenses. I didn't realize there were multiple. It's this one: h

Re: New program based on 2 differently-licensed previous ones

2008-02-17 Thread Ben Finney
"Cameron Dale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm creating a new program for Debian (not just packaging, but the > entire program), and I have some questions about the license I can > use. Some parts of the code are based on a previous work released > under the MIT license Which MIT license? MIT h

Re: New program based on 2 differently-licensed previous ones

2008-02-17 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Cameron Dale wrote: > I'm creating a new program for Debian (not just packaging, but the > entire program), and I have some questions about the license I can > use. Some parts of the code are based on a previous work released > under the MIT license, while some other small part

New program based on 2 differently-licensed previous ones

2008-02-17 Thread Cameron Dale
Hi, I'm creating a new program for Debian (not just packaging, but the entire program), and I have some questions about the license I can use. Some parts of the code are based on a previous work released under the MIT license, while some other small parts are based on GPL (v2) code from a differen