Hi,
I've found that music tracks for The Battle for Wesnoth (package wesnoth-music
in Debian) are only provided as compressed Ogg Vorbis files, without any
information used to generate them. I have two questions:
* Does wesnoth-music comply with DFSG? I've heard that at certain point DFSG
only
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:08:27AM +0400, Evgeny Kapun wrote:
> Hi,
> I've found that music tracks for The Battle for Wesnoth (package
> wesnoth-music in Debian) are only provided as compressed Ogg Vorbis files,
> without any information used to generate them. I have two questions:
>
> * Does we
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:38:34PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote:
> > * Does distributing wesnoth-music without source code comply with its
> > license (GPL 2+)?
>
> No. The copyright holders can distribute their own work in any way they like,
No discussion here...
> but anybody else breaches the GP
Hi,
first of all, I'd like to point out that this topic is NOT a wesnoth
specific one. I have tried to bring up the point several times in the
past (even years ago), it was always sorta ignored, even though people
said that "yeah, surely the flattened images/music scores aren't source
nor pre
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 19:58:59 -0500 Guilherme de Siqueira Pastore wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:38:34PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote:
[...]
> > but anybody else breaches the GPL 2 or 3 by not offering source code.
>
> ... but I tend to disagree at this point. Despite the possibility of
> consider
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:57:39PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I am not convinced: if someone releases a work under the GPL without
> making the corresponding source available, nobody else really has the
> true permission to redistribute, as the license requires
> re-distributors to make source
Francesco Poli dijo [Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:57:39PM +0200]:
> > > but anybody else breaches the GPL 2 or 3 by not offering source code.
> >
> > ... but I tend to disagree at this point. Despite the possibility of
> > considering these file types as source code for the relevant purposes under
> >
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:52:38 -0500 Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Francesco Poli dijo [Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:57:39PM +0200]:
> > > > but anybody else breaches the GPL 2 or 3 by not offering source code.
> > >
> > > ... but I tend to disagree at this point. Despite the possibility of
> > > considering the
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:56:55 -0500 Guilherme de Siqueira Pastore wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 07:57:39PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I am not convinced: if someone releases a work under the GPL without
> > making the corresponding source available, nobody else really has the
> > true perm
9 matches
Mail list logo
