Hi,
I apologize for digging up this nearly six-year-old email, but I
wanted to let you know that we just launched the "CMap Resources" open
source project, which includes all of our CMap resources under a more
favorable open source license. See:
http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/
On Jan 29, 2004, at 21:31, Branden Robinson wrote:
Adobe is probably busy "lobbying" to get a certain bill passed which
will rectify that little "defect" in U.S. copyright law.
If the Court has any shred of basic literacy left in reading the
Constitution, that should go nowhere. Not sure at t
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 07:10:52PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:19:56AM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> > The comparison is made to altering the ascii mapping -- but the ascii
> > mapping is not copyrightable. It's just a sequence of characters, as
> > valid as a
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:19:56AM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> The comparison is made to altering the ascii mapping -- but the ascii
> mapping is not copyrightable. It's just a sequence of characters, as
> valid as any other and preferred only because of broad adoption.
>
> Are these CMa
The comparison is made to altering the ascii mapping -- but the ascii
mapping is not copyrightable. It's just a sequence of characters, as
valid as any other and preferred only because of broad adoption.
Are these CMap files actually copyrightable as creative works?
-Brian
--
Brian Sniffen
O Xoves, 29 de Xaneiro de 2004 ás 17:06:06 +0900, Kenshi Muto escribía:
> Do you have any idea to cope with this situation? Or does anyone come
> up with possible proposal so that Adobe can be persuaded? I
> appreciate your help.
They claim that integrity of the CMap files is the main issue. W
lar to
those of GFDL with invariant cl. or RFC documents.
- ---
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:22:03 -0800
From: Ken Lunde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: On the possibility of changing the license of Adobe CMap files
In-reply-to: <[
Hatta-san,
I apologize for taking so long to reply to this request, but we needed
sufficient time to carefully consider the request, and to think about
the consequences, both good and bad. The short reply is that we shall
decline this request, for reasons explained below.
1) We have been met
8 matches
Mail list logo