I'm thinking about packaging the Java-based Open Card Framework
for use in accessing "smart cards". It's freely available from
www.opencard.org. I'm using it with a Java-based iButton
(www.ibutton.org). The license is enclosed below, unchanged
except for formatting to fit within standard email m
On 27-Mar-2002 Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I'm thinking about packaging the Java-based Open Card Framework
> for use in accessing "smart cards". It's freely available from
> www.opencard.org. I'm using it with a Java-based iButton
> (www.ibutton.org). The license is enclosed below, unchanged
> except fo
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking about packaging the Java-based Open Card Framework
> for use in accessing "smart cards". It's freely available from
> www.opencard.org. I'm using it with a Java-based iButton
> (www.ibutton.org). The license is enclosed below, unchanged
> excep
Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone see a reason why it is not DFSG-free? The paragraph
> > that bothers me the most is the one at the end of clause 3:
> >
> > Each Contributor agrees to provide condensed summaries of its
> > C
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It may be impossible for people to make any notifications. Certain
> > uses may preclude it, like making nuclear bombs, running a terrorist
> > network, or hacking on a desert island.
>
> The clause does not spec
5 matches
Mail list logo
