Giulio
Is there any way to be 100% sure? I am still waiting for a reply
from upstream on this.
As far as I know, the only way to be 100% sure is for it to be subject
to a precedent-setting court ruling or legislation, but even that will
only provide certainty for one jurisdiction - and it's
I just read in the archive (I am not subscribed to the list) the other replies
to my email.
Thank you very much for your answers.
Bests,
Giulio.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 13107 March 1977, Giulio Paci wrote:
During a package review it came out that the software license includes
this statement: Should a provision of no. 9 and 10 of the GNU General
Public License be invalid or become invalid, a valid provision is deemed
to have been agreed upon which comes
Il 30/01/2013 13:58, MJ Ray ha scritto:
Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com
Should a provision of no. 9 and 10 of the GNU General Public License be
invalid or become invalid, a valid provision is deemed to have been agreed
upon which comes closest
to what the parties intended commercially. In
Le mercredi 30 janvier 2013 à 02:03 +0100, Giulio Paci a écrit :
During a package review it came out that the software license includes this
statement:
Should a provision of no. 9 and 10 of the GNU General Public License be
invalid or become invalid, a valid provision is deemed to have been
Giulio Paci giuliop...@gmail.com
Should a provision of no. 9 and 10 of the GNU General Public License be
invalid or become invalid, a valid provision is deemed to have been agreed
upon which comes closest
to what the parties intended commercially. In any case guarantee/warranty
shall be
6 matches
Mail list logo
