Op do, 16-03-2006 te 04:35 -0500, schreef Nathanael Nerode:
> Jesse van den Kieboom wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As I tried to do an ITP my package
> > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=347934) got rejected
> > because the copyrights weren't in order. Now I'm a bit in the open
> > bec
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Jesse van den Kieboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> My situation is as follows. The application itself is GPL licenced, but
>> some of the code has been taken from the lambdamoo server. The lambdamoo
>> source is copyrighted with the following copyright:
>
>> Copyr
Jesse van den Kieboom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I tried to do an ITP my package
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=347934) got rejected
> because the copyrights weren't in order. Now I'm a bit in the open
> because I don't have much experience with having different parts of an
> applic
Scripsit Benjamin A'Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 12:22 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Scripsit Jesse van den Kieboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Copyright (c) 1992, 1995, 1996 Xerox Corporation. All rights
>> > reserved.
>> ...
>> > Any distribution of this software or deriva
"Benjamin A'Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 12:22 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Scripsit Jesse van den Kieboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > My situation is as follows. The application itself is GPL licenced, but
> > > some of the code has been taken from the lambdamoo
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 03:34:07PM +, Benjamin A'Lee wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 12:22 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Scripsit Jesse van den Kieboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > My situation is as follows. The application itself is GPL licenced, but
> > > some of the code has been taken fro
This one time, at band camp, Benjamin A'Lee said:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 12:22 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Scripsit Jesse van den Kieboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ...
> > > Any distribution of this software or derivative works must comply
> > > with all applicable United States export contr
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 12:22 +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Jesse van den Kieboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > My situation is as follows. The application itself is GPL licenced, but
> > some of the code has been taken from the lambdamoo server. The lambdamoo
> > source is copyrighted with t
Scripsit Jesse van den Kieboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My situation is as follows. The application itself is GPL licenced, but
> some of the code has been taken from the lambdamoo server. The lambdamoo
> source is copyrighted with the following copyright:
> Copyright (c) 1992, 1995, 1996 Xerox Co
Jesse van den Kieboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As I tried to do an ITP my package
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=347934) got rejected
> because the copyrights weren't in order.[...]
I'm confused. If you listed those three licences in the copyright
file, it seems fine at first gla
Jesse van den Kieboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /**
> Copyright (c) 1992, 1995, 1996 Xerox Corporation. All rights
> reserved.
> Portions of this code were written by Stephen White, aka ghond.
> Use and copying o
Hi,
As I tried to do an ITP my package
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=347934) got rejected
because the copyrights weren't in order. Now I'm a bit in the open
because I don't have much experience with having different parts of an
application having different copyrights etc.
My s
12 matches
Mail list logo
