Re: Perl module licensing, the next step

2003-02-11 Thread Sam Hartman
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:39:13PM -0600, Ardo van Steve Rangelrooij wrote: Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:25:26PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: I've been contacted by Ann

Re: Perl module licensing, the next step

2003-02-11 Thread James Troup
Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You can always introduce a GR. This is fucking ridiculous; I've already explained twice what Ardo needs to do to get his packages past us and that's simply to comply with policy. I've already explained twice that the problems with the equivocal (at best)

Re: Perl module licensing, the next step

2003-02-09 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:25:26PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: I've been contacted by Ann Barcomb (see her message below; below that is her second message to me) about the Perl module license issue. I've put her on the Cc and would appreciate it if you could keep her on the list of

Re: Perl module licensing, the next step

2003-02-09 Thread Ardo van Rangelrooij
Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:25:26PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: I've been contacted by Ann Barcomb (see her message below; below that is her second message to me) about the Perl module license issue. I've put her on the Cc and would appreciate

Re: Perl module licensing, the next step

2003-02-09 Thread Don Armstrong
This is not legal advice. I am not a lawyer. On Sun, 09 Feb 2003, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Perhaps (taking the GPL as a hint): This module is available under the same terms and conditions as Perl itself, version 5.3 or (at your option) any

Re: Perl module licensing, the next step

2003-02-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:39:13PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: Glenn Maynard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:25:26PM -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: I've been contacted by Ann Barcomb (see her message below; below that is her second message to me) about