Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
* MJ Ray:
3. is the licence any obstacle to meeting DFSG?
It doesn't mention the act of running the program or using it.
Or does this activity fall under display?
The licence does mention using it, in Your use of this software code
is at your own
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:33:16 + MJ Ray wrote:
[...]
it claims to
be New BSD which seems very untrue, comparing the S3.rb licence to
http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license
Wow! That's a very useful URL!
I've been missing a good (and stable) URL for the 3-clause BSD license,
since
* MJ Ray:
3. is the licence any obstacle to meeting DFSG?
It doesn't mention the act of running the program or using it.
Or does this activity fall under display?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
I hope no-one minds, but I'd like some smart analysis of this software's
licence, so I'm asking debian-legal for their views.
Please keep the Cc to the ITP report on replies.
juanro...@gmail.com wrote:
* Package name: s3sync-ruby
* URL : http://s3sync.net/
* License :
Please, also see the licence for the file
http://code.google.com/p/s3sync-s3cmd/source/browse/trunk/s3sync/S3.rb
# This software code is made available AS IS without warranties of any
# kind. You may copy, display, modify and redistribute the software
# code either by itself or as
5 matches
Mail list logo