Re: RFS: ognl

2009-08-10 Thread Hendrik Weimer
Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org writes: I don't like: * 5. Products derived from this software may not be called * OpenSymphony *or OGNL, nor may OpenSymphony or OGNL appear in their *name, without prior written permission of the OpenSymphony *Group. since we are, arguably,

Re: RFS: ognl

2009-08-09 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sun Aug 09 23:02, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: I've reviewed the package and it looks clean, but I have one question. Which bit is licenced under the apache-derived licence? I can only find BSD-licenced files. OpenSymfony Licence (Apache derived one) is promoted by upstream as official

Re: RFS: ognl

2009-08-09 Thread Russ Allbery
Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org writes: I don't like: * 5. Products derived from this software may not be called * OpenSymphony *or OGNL, nor may OpenSymphony or OGNL appear in their *name, without prior written permission of the OpenSymphony *Group. since we are, arguably,

Re: RFS: ognl

2009-08-09 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le dimanche 09 août 2009 23:53:41, Matthew Johnson a écrit : On Sun Aug 09 23:02, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: I've reviewed the package and it looks clean, but I have one question. Which bit is licenced under the apache-derived licence? I can only find BSD-licenced files. OpenSymfony