On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:41:08AM -0500, Dave Harding wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> > > Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use
> > > this trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking
>
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:41:08AM -0500, Dave Harding wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> > > Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use
> > > this trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking
>
Dave Harding wrote:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use
this trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking
system and implement some form of version management" (I
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:41:08AM -0500, Dave Harding wrote:
> Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 01 Jan 2005 10:06:17 -0500
> said:
>
> So we have to therefore say "beyond a certain level of change,
> please remove our trademarks".
>
> What purpose is served by Mozilla
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> > Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use
> > this trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking
> > system and implement some form of version management" (I might
> > s
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use this
> trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking system and
> implement some form of version management" (I might still, on a question
> of practicali
6 matches
Mail list logo