Re: Strange restrictions

2005-01-02 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:41:08AM -0500, Dave Harding wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote: > > > Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use > > > this trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking >

Re: Strange restrictions

2005-01-02 Thread Joel Aelwyn
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:41:08AM -0500, Dave Harding wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote: > > > Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use > > > this trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking >

Re: Strange restrictions

2005-01-02 Thread Gervase Markham
Dave Harding wrote: Andrew Suffield wrote: On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote: Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use this trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking system and implement some form of version management" (I

Re: Strange restrictions

2005-01-02 Thread Raul Miller
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:41:08AM -0500, Dave Harding wrote: > Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, 01 Jan 2005 10:06:17 -0500 > said: > > So we have to therefore say "beyond a certain level of change, > please remove our trademarks". > > What purpose is served by Mozilla

Re: Strange restrictions

2005-01-02 Thread Dave Harding
Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote: > > Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use > > this trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking > > system and implement some form of version management" (I might > > s

Strange restrictions

2005-01-02 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:59:08AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote: > Mind you, I don't think I'd necessarily have an issue with "To use this > trademark, you must run a publically reviewable bug tracking system and > implement some form of version management" (I might still, on a question > of practicali