Limesurvey in Debian: trademark question

2013-01-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi all, I'm finally having another look at packaging limesurvey for Debian (http://www.limesurvey.org/). Licensing mostly looks fine: It is mostly GPL v2 or later; one bit is PHP, and the rest is LGPL. (There is a reference to a problematic license in the license file, but actually that is

Re: gnome-mastermind trademark question

2008-12-02 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2008/12/2 Filippo Argiolas [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Miriam, probably you should forward them my last reply too. Yup, sorry, I wrote my email before yours. As I said I'm open to a name change or a suggestion. The game it's been in Debian for more than one year now and no one ever complained.

Re: gnome-mastermind trademark question

2008-12-02 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:20, Filippo Argiolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could have continued to ignore it but *I* choosed to resume this issue because I'm a bit worried about it, so, please stop talking about unilateral changes or things like that. Again, there has been a misunderstanding.

Re: gnome-mastermind trademark question

2008-12-02 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2008/12/2 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ok, well in that case I'll pass I'm already bothering legal way too often with games related questions. It would be better to have a name upstream likes, but if the name is not legally safe for Fedora, it won't be for Debian either and ignoring the

Re: gnome-mastermind trademark question

2008-12-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:49:34AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: It would be better to have a name upstream likes, but if the name is not legally safe for Fedora, it won't be for Debian either and ignoring the problem won't fix it. From the limited context you've provided, there's nothing to

Re: gnome-mastermind trademark question

2008-12-02 Thread Filippo Argiolas
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/12/2 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ok, well in that case I'll pass I'm already bothering legal way too often with games related questions. It would be better to have a name upstream likes, but if the name is not

Trademark question

2005-06-15 Thread nodata
Probably an easy one.. SYBASE, INC. TRADEMARKS (Effective March 22, 2004) APT Workbench(tm) APT-Build(tm) problem? APT-Edit(tm) APT-Execute(tm) APT-Translator(tm) APT-Library(tm) http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1011207 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: Trademark question

2005-06-15 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, nodata wrote: http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1011207 The only registered trademark they have on apt-something is on APT-FORMS which is now dead. http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=docstate=fter6b.5.94 Don Armstrong -- Miracles had become relative common-places

Re: Trademark question

2005-06-15 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 01:40:12PM +0200, nodata wrote: Probably an easy one.. SYBASE, INC. TRADEMARKS (Effective March 22, 2004) APT Workbench(tm) APT-Build(tm) problem? I can't imagine that we would care, and they certainly don't have any basis for claim against us. -- .''`. **