Re: Vim should be moved to non-free (See #132251)

2002-02-03 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Lazarus Long wrote: > Reading /usr/share/doc/vim/copyright, it appears this package fails to > comply with point 3 of the DFSG. If so, this seems "messy" at best, > since it has been in main in previous releases, hence should probably be > discussed on this list. If you are interested

Vim should be moved to non-free (See #132251)

2002-02-03 Thread Lazarus Long
Reading /usr/share/doc/vim/copyright, it appears this package fails to comply with point 3 of the DFSG. If so, this seems "messy" at best, since it has been in main in previous releases, hence should probably be discussed on this list. [EMAIL PROTECTED] contains the actual bug report. (Consider