Re: What "new name" means?

2003-01-31 Thread Doug Winter
On Thu 30 Jan Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > BTW can you give some examples of licences, that explicitly say, that > whole fscking name must be changed, not just version number? Does such > beasts really exist? http://www.apache.org/LICENSE.txt > * 5. Products derived from this software may not be ca

Re: What "new name" means?

2003-01-30 Thread Terry Hancock
On Thursday 30 January 2003 03:41 am, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > It seems, that some licences require, that modified versions of original > work must have new name. For example Design Science Licence is like > that > But what constitutes "new name"? > If I release some poem called "Ode to Buffer O

Re: What "new name" means?

2003-01-30 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > BTW can you give some examples of licences, that explicitly say, that > whole fscking name must be changed, not just version number? Does such > beasts really exist? Many components of teTeX come under such licenses. There was a major flamewar on

Re: What "new name" means?

2003-01-30 Thread Michael Stutz
Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems, that some licences require, that modified versions of original > work must have new name. For example Design Science Licence is like > that: > > http://www.dsl.org/copyleft/dsl.txt > > [...] > > But what constitutes "new name"? The point

What "new name" means?

2003-01-30 Thread Juhapekka Tolvanen
It seems, that some licences require, that modified versions of original work must have new name. For example Design Science Licence is like that: http://www.dsl.org/copyleft/dsl.txt "(b) The derivative work is given a new name, so that its name or title cannot be confused with the Work, or with