Re: Would you please review this non-free license?

2003-01-24 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 02:11:06AM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote: > Good points -- I'll fill a bug against ftp.debian.org to remove the > package. > Probably it could be converted in an installer. -- Francesco P. Lovergine

Re: Would you please review this non-free license?

2003-01-24 Thread Kevin Rosenberg
Good points -- I'll fill a bug against ftp.debian.org to remove the package. Thanks! -- Kevin Rosenberg| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** http://b9.com/debian.html | : :' : The universal GPG signed and encrypted| `. `' Operating System messages accepted.

Re: Would you please review this non-free license?

2003-01-24 Thread Richard Braakman
My points of concern are: This Agreement, dated , is entered into by Mentec Inc., a Massachusetts Company, located at 55 Technology Drive, Lowell, MA 01851, U.S.A. (MENTEC), and _ having a residence at __

Would you please review this non-free license?

2003-01-23 Thread Kevin Rosenberg
Hello Debian Legal Guys, I've recently adopted a non-free package (simh-rsts-images). During the process of renaming the package, an ftpmaster has concerns that the license perhaps prevents even inclusion in the non-free archive. I've included the license below. The point of concerns are: "..