On 01/09/14 20:03, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> What would I put into debian/copyright? GPL2+ (which is what upstream uses but
> is unredistributable) or GPL3+?
If it was me, I'd state the facts:
Format:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Files: *
Copyrigh
Hi,
Quoting Simon McVittie (2014-08-31 23:27:20)
> [snip]
>
> The license applicable to the binaries is still not GPL-3, though - it is
> ((GPL-2 or GPL-3 or ...) and Apache-2.0). The practical result is the same as
> ((GPL-3 or ...) and Apache-2.0), but it matters if you're going to extract
> GPL
Hi,
Quoting Riley Baird (2014-08-31 23:02:57)
> > As it is pointed out here [5] and here [6], GPL2 is incompatible with
> > Apache2
> > but GPL3 projects can contain Apache2 licensed code. Since vcmi is licensed
> > GPL2+, could the Debian package upgrade the license to GPL3+ and thus turn
> > i
On 31/08/14 17:54, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> As it is pointed out here [5] and here [6], GPL2 is incompatible with Apache2
> but GPL3 projects can contain Apache2 licensed code. Since vcmi is licensed
> GPL2+, could the Debian package upgrade the license to GPL3+ and thus turn it
> into a GPL3 proj
> As it is pointed out here [5] and here [6], GPL2 is incompatible with Apache2
> but GPL3 projects can contain Apache2 licensed code. Since vcmi is licensed
> GPL2+, could the Debian package upgrade the license to GPL3+ and thus turn it
> into a GPL3 project with Apache2 code which should be compa
Hi,
I'm trying to package vcmi [1], a reimplementation of the Heroes of Might and
Magic 3 engine [2]. I'm hitting a legal roadblock now because vcmi embeds an
old version of fuzzylite [3] which is licensed under Apache2. Vcmi itself is
licensed under GPL2+. I was made aware that the GPL2 and Apach
6 matches
Mail list logo
