* Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-06 23:19]:
Or as Wouter pointed out on d-d port glibc.
Which I think would be most beneficial as it additianaly would minimize
the number of packages to add to the archive for the solaris port in
case nexentas work should become a debian subproject
I suppose porting glibc is quite important because it also minimises
the porting of everything else that may need to be adapted.
andrew
On 4/7/06, Martin Wuertele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-04-06 23:19]:
Or as Wouter pointed out on d-d port glibc.
(d-l may give advice)
So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from
*every* copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc.
(the GNU utils would be easier as there is _usually_ only one
copyright holder: FSF) or OpenSolaris needs to relicense (impossible
as Sun
Or as Wouter pointed out on d-d port glibc.
andrew
On 4/7/06, Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(d-l may give advice)
So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from
*every* copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc.
(the GNU utils would be easier
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:24:10PM -0700, Alex Ross wrote:
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
(d-l may give advice)
So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from *every*
copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc. (the GNU
utils would be easier as there is
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:24:10PM -0700, Alex Ross wrote:
GPLv3 is available at [1]. The draft removes ambiguities of GPLv2, and
in particular, clarifies the old GPLv2 clause 3: You may copy and
distribute the Program ... During the discussion [2],
6 matches
Mail list logo
