Hello,
On 16 October 2014 21:51, Riley Baird
wrote:
> Not really. It's possible to use a web browser or a media player only
> for free content, and if you don't, you have specifically chosen to do so.
Same here. You may trace any other tiles if you want. And if you've
chosen to trace Bing, that'
On 17/10/2014 4:39 am, "Felix Natter" wrote:
> 3. I will remove the logo and tilesource/BingAerialTileSource.java from
> the jmapviewer package (which should resolve any licensing issues). josm
> will FTBFS, Sebastiaan and I will try to add a patch to josm such that
> it works without bing (but ma
Hi Felix,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 07:39:08PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>
> Short term sponsoring will be much appreciated :-)
In case I'm not AFK (on 20.+21.10. I will be offline) usually sponsoring
in a less than 24h time frame is the usual response time.
Please keep on your good work
On 16/10/14 20:40, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello Ian,
>
> On 16 October 2014 01:56, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Another possibility would be to have the program download the logo
>> itself from the Bing website somewhere, along with the Bing map data,
>> when the Bing option is used, but such a thing o
Andreas Tille writes:
> Hi Bas,
hello Andreas,
hello All,
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 09:48:35AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> ...
>> If we cannot get around disabling the Bing support because of the
>> license issues around the logo, I think we should remove the josm
>> package forcing
Sebastiaan Couwenberg writes:
> On 10/16/2014 07:22 AM, Felix Natter wrote:
>> hi Ian,
>> Sorry but I've worked ~2 years on the freeplane package for it to be in
>> jessie/main,
>> und we're ~2 weeks from the jessie freeze, so if including the logo is DFSG
>> compliant then that is enough for m
Hello Ian,
On 16 October 2014 01:56, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Another possibility would be to have the program download the logo
> itself from the Bing website somewhere, along with the Bing map data,
> when the Bing option is used, but such a thing ought to be in contrib.
I doubt so. That'd put all
Hello,
On 16 October 2014 07:22, Felix Natter wrote:
> Sorry but I've worked ~2 years on the freeplane package for it to be in
> jessie/main,
> und we're ~2 weeks from the jessie freeze, so if including the logo is DFSG
> compliant
> then that is enough for me.
> => So I see two options:
>
> 1.
On 10/16/2014 07:22 AM, Felix Natter wrote:
> hi Ian,
> Sorry but I've worked ~2 years on the freeplane package for it to be in
> jessie/main,
> und we're ~2 weeks from the jessie freeze, so if including the logo is DFSG
> compliant then that is enough for me.
> => So I see two options:
> 1. I ge
Best Regards,
Felix Natter
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Oktober 2014 um 01:56 Uhr
Von: "Ian Jackson"
An: "Felix Natter"
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, "Debian GIS Project"
Betreff: Re: jmapviewer: bing logo
Felix Natter writes ("jmapviewer: bing l
Felix Natter writes ("jmapviewer: bing logo"):
> I as the package author originally thought that we should not advertise
> bing, but Sebastiaan from debian-gis argues that we violated MS terms of
> use by not including it (please see the PDF link included in that mail):
I a
> we are discussing whether or not the bing logo image [1] should be shipped
> with
> the "jmapviewer" package in main.
>
> I as the package author originally thought that we should not advertise
> bing, but Sebastiaan from debian-gis argues that we violated MS terms of
> use by not including it
Dear debian-legal experts,
we are discussing whether or not the bing logo image [1] should be shipped with
the "jmapviewer" package in main.
I as the package author originally thought that we should not advertise
bing, but Sebastiaan from debian-gis argues that we violated MS terms of
use by not
13 matches
Mail list logo
