Re: licenses with name changing clauses

2006-05-28 Thread Frank Küster
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> While we're at it, there's a different issue in teTeX and TeXLive for >> which I'd like to have some advice from -legal. ukhyphen.tex has now a >> supposedly free license, but it has a broader renaming claus

Re: PHP license style [was: Re: licenses with name changing clauses]

2006-05-27 Thread MJ Ray
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:41:16 +0100 MJ Ray wrote: > > Wow, that's arrogant, not only reserving the package's filename > > (arguably acceptable to ensure integrity) but the names of many > > possible derivatives/competitors. > > Does this mean that you agree with

PHP license style [was: Re: licenses with name changing clauses]

2006-05-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 26 May 2006 13:41:16 +0100 MJ Ray wrote: > =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > While we're at it, there's a different issue in teTeX and TeXLive > > for which I'd like to have some advice from -legal. ukhyphen.tex has > > now a supposedly free license, but it has a broa

Re: licenses with name changing clauses (was: license of cstex / cslatex)

2006-05-26 Thread MJ Ray
=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > While we're at it, there's a different issue in teTeX and TeXLive for > which I'd like to have some advice from -legal. ukhyphen.tex has now a > supposedly free license, but it has a broader renaming clause: Wow, that's arrogant, not only reser

licenses with name changing clauses (was: license of cstex / cslatex)

2006-05-26 Thread Frank Küster
Thomas Esser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had done modifications of three files of that package and distributed > the changed files using the original filename. The author told me that > this violates his license. Actually, this only happened, because when > reading his license the first time, I